Allahabad High Court Orders Security for Haseen Khan
The Allahabad High Court has mandated round-the-clock armed security for Haseen Khan, a significant decision following a controversial incident in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh. The court’s ruling comes in response to allegations that Khan was prevented from offering Namaz inside his private residence.
In its directive, the court ordered that two armed guards accompany Haseen Khan at all times until further notice. Justice Atul Sreedharan emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating, “Any incident of violence that afflicts him or his property shall be prima facie understood to have occurred at the instance of the State.” This statement underscores the court’s commitment to protecting the rights of individuals to practice their religion freely.
The case originated from a petition filed by Tarik Khan, who sought permission to conduct prayers during the holy month of Ramadan. The court ruled that no prior state permission is required for religious gatherings within private property, provided they do not extend onto public roads or spaces. This ruling is a notable affirmation of constitutional religious freedoms, reinforcing the principle that individuals should not face undue interference from authorities in their private religious practices.
The controversy traces back to an incident on January 16, 2026, when Haseen Khan alleged that he was detained by police while praying at home with family members. He claimed he was coerced into placing his thumbprint on a document he could not read due to illiteracy. This incident raised serious concerns about the treatment of individuals exercising their religious rights.
Furthermore, the court had previously issued contempt notices to Bareilly District Magistrate Avinash Singh and Senior Superintendent of Police Anurag Arya for their roles in interfering with prayer activities. The court has summoned both officials to appear in person on March 23, 2026, with a warning that failure to comply could result in the issuance of non-bailable warrants.
The matter has been listed for final orders on the same date, and observers are keenly awaiting the court’s next steps. The court’s emphasis on holding authorities accountable for their actions reflects a broader commitment to uphold the rule of law and protect individual rights.
As the situation develops, details remain unconfirmed regarding the implications of the court’s ruling on local law enforcement practices and the broader context of religious freedoms in India. The upcoming hearing on March 23 will likely provide further clarity on these issues.
