“The court also sentenced two associates of Andrabi, Sofi Fehmeeda and Nahida Nasreen, who were also convicted for 30 years in prison in the same case.” This statement encapsulates the recent ruling by a Delhi court regarding Asiya Andrabi and her associates.
On March 24, 2026, the court sentenced Andrabi to life imprisonment under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The court found her guilty of being a member of a terrorist organization, specifically the banned Dukhtaran-e-Millat (DeM).
The court’s decision followed a thorough investigation by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), which had been initiated on the directions of the Union Ministry of Home Affairs. The NIA successfully demonstrated that all three accused were active members of the proscribed organization.
Andrabi, along with her associates, was convicted for promoting secessionist ideology and inciting hatred against India. The court ruled under multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and UAPA, reflecting the severity of their actions.
Dukhtaran-e-Millat, founded in 1987 and banned in 2004, is a Kashmir-based all-women outfit known for its extremist views. The organization has been under scrutiny for its activities that challenge the sovereignty of India.
The NIA’s probe into the activities of DeM has been ongoing since Andrabi’s arrest in 2018, highlighting the government’s commitment to tackling terrorism and separatism in the region.
Asiya Andrabi’s life sentence marks a significant development in India’s legal battle against terrorism, particularly involving organizations that promote anti-national sentiments.
With her associates receiving 30-year sentences, the court’s ruling sends a strong message about the consequences of engaging in terrorist activities.
Further developments in this case are anticipated as the legal proceedings continue, with potential appeals from the convicted individuals likely to follow.
Details remain unconfirmed regarding the next steps from the defense team as they evaluate their options in light of the court’s ruling.
